Nature Neuroscience

Racial equity and inclusion still lacking in neuroscience meetings

  • 1.

    Civil Rights Act of 1964 78 Stat. 241 (1964).

  • 2.

    Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 82 Stat.73 (1968).

  • 3.

    Civil Rights Act of 1991 PL. 102–166 (1991).

  • 4.

    SfN Statement on Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity https://www.sfn.org/publications/latest-news/2020/06/02/sfn-statement-on-diversity,-inclusion,-and-equity (2020).

  • 5.

    Cell Editorial Team Cell 181, 1443–1444 (2020).

  • 6.

    Nature 582, 147 (2020).

  • 7.

    Hofstra, B. et al. The diversity-innovation paradox in science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9284–9291 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Walker, R. Early Am. Stud. 19, 601–640 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Brandt, A. M. Racism and Research: The Case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (The Hastings Center, 1978).

  • 10.

    Truog, R. D., Kesselheim, A. S. & Joffe, S. Science 337, 37–38 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Hardeman, R. R., Medina, E. M. & Kozhimannil, K. B. N. Engl. J Med. 375, 2113–2115 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Pollock, A. R. D. et al. Catalyst 3, 1–38 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Jones, C. P. Ethn. Dis. 28, 231–234 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Burke, L. #ShutDownSTEM Inside Higher Ed https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/06/11/scientists-strike-black-lives-more-inclusive-academia (2020).

  • 15.

    Society for Neuroscience Black Lives Matter and Neuroscience: Why This Moment Matters https://neuronline.sfn.org/diversity/black-lives-matter-and-neuroscience (2020).

  • 16.

    Ramos, R. L., Alvina, K. & Martinez, L. R. J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ. 16, A6–A13 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    NCES Characteristics of Postsecondary Faculty https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/csc (2020).

  • 18.

    Gibbs, K. D., Basson, J., Xierali, I. M. & Broniatowski, D. A. Elife 5, e21393 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Valantine, H. A., Lund, P. K. & Gammie, A. E. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 15, 3 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Hodes, R. J. Diversity in Scientific Meetings and Conferences Optimizes Research Innovations https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/diversity-scientific-meetings-and-conferences-optimizes-research-innovations (National Institute on Aging, 2019).

  • 21.

    Nat. Methods 16, 563 (2019).

  • 22.

    Platt, M. O. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 783–784 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Pendergrass, A. et al. Guide to Organizing Inclusive Scientific Meetings: Where to Start (500 Women Scientists, 2019).

  • 24.

    Crutcher, B. N. Liberal Educ. 100, 2 (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Forrester, N. Nature 585, S65–S67 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Foxx, A. J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14931–14936 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     


  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Back to top button